3er Torneo Promocional Ciudad de Montevideo

Open SwissStandard

40 players participated in this 5-round tournament, held from 02 Feb 2026 to 06 Feb 2026 in Montevideo, Uruguay. 5 federations represented. Top 10 Elo average was 1740, and top seed was Daniel Iglesias (🇺🇾 URU, 1786).

Diego Sosa Cadiac (🇺🇾 URU, 1747) won with 4.0/5, ahead of Camilo Caminada (4.0) and Matteo Reyes (4.0). Sosa Cadiac shared the lead from round 4, winning on tie-break.

The biggest upset came in round 1: Gustavo Tramutolo (1550) beat Gustavo Rodriguez Sosa (1724), a +174-point gap.

Location

🇺🇾Montevideo, Uruguay

Dates

02 Feb 2026 → 06 Feb 2026

Time control

Standard: 60 minutes with 30 seconds increment from move 1

System

Swiss · 5 rounds

Top seed

🇺🇾Daniel Iglesias1786

Avg top 10

1,740

Participants

Federations · 5 represented

🇺🇾Uruguay×36

🇦🇷Argentina×1

🇧🇷Brazil×1

🇱🇨Saint Lucia×1

🇷🇺Russia×1

Top 3

🥇
Diego Sosa Cadiac
🇺🇾URU·1747
4.0pts·1966perf+35.2
🥈
Camilo Caminada
🇺🇾URU·1688
4.0pts·1870perf+45.2
🥉
Matteo Reyes
🇺🇾URU·1584
4.0pts·1872perf+60.4

How it unfolded

Top 6 · 5 rounds

Tight race until R3; 3 players tied at 4.0/5, decided on Buchholz. Title race narrowed from 2 co-leaders at R4 to 3 at the finish.

Co-leaders

Caminada4Sosa Cadiac4Reyes4Esquibel3.5Iglesias3.5Comas3.5

R3–R5 · LEAD HELD

Camilo Caminada held the sole lead from R3 through R5 without losing it.

R5 · TIEBREAK CLUSTER

3 players finish on 4.0/5. Sosa Cadiac takes the title on Buchholz Cut1 (12.5).

WIN STREAKS · 2 top finishers

Camilo Caminada 3 wins (R1–R3)Matteo Reyes 3 wins (R3–R5)

Key matchups · top 4

Head-to-head between the four finishers

Player	1	2	3	4
1Camilo Caminada	*	—	—	—
2Diego Sosa Cadiac	—	*	1	—
3Matteo Reyes	—	0	*	—
4Juan Esquibel	—	—	—	*

Grille américaine

#	Player	Elo	Fed	R1	R2	R3	R4	R5	Pts	Bu C1	Bu	SB	Perf	Δ
1	Sosa Cadiac, Diego	1747	URU	+31N	+3B	=18N	+21B	=6N	4.0	12.5	14.5	11.50	1966	+35.2
2	Caminada, Camilo	1688	URU	+15N	+32B	+25N	−4B	+13N	4.0	11.5	13.0	9.50	1870	+45.2
3	Reyes, Matteo	1584	URU	+38B	−1N	+32N	+25B	+11B	4.0	10.5	10.5	6.50	1872	+60.4
4	Iglesias, Daniel	1786	URU	+34B	=19N	+14B	+2N	−7B	3.5	13.0	14.5	9.75	1801	+5.6
5	Comas, Martin	1757	LCA	+27N	=8B	=10N	+22B	=9N	3.5	12.5	14.5	9.50	1734	-2.4
6	Vassallo, Julio	1764	URU	+29B	=33N	+20B	=12N	=1B	3.5	11.5	13.0	8.75	1745	-1.0
7	Dos Santos, Gustavo Jonathan	1784	URU	F	=14N	+19B	+18B	+4N	3.5	11.5	11.5	10.00	1941	+10.8
8	Miranda, Eddy	1620	URU	+40B	=5N	−11B	+33N	+12B	3.5	11.0	11.0	6.25	1709	+18.8
9	Esquibel, Juan	1606	URU	−20B	+39N	+36B	+10N	=5B	3.5	10.5	10.5	6.25	1916	+54.4
10	Miladinoff, David	1545	URU	=11B	+16N	=5B	−9B	+26N	3.0	13.0	15.0	8.25	1755	+28.0
11	De Cuadro, Dionisio	1706	URU	=10N	=24B	+8N	+27B	−3N	3.0	13.0	15.0	8.25	1678	-3.4
12	Gonzalez, Jose Luis	0	URU	+22N	=21B	+26N	=6B	−8N	3.0	12.0	14.0	7.50	1671	0.0
13	Dellapiazza, Santiago	1583	URU	−18N	+15B	+35N	+23B	−2B	3.0	12.0	13.5	7.00	1750	+26.8
14	Laguna, Andres	1602	URU	+37N	=7B	−4N	=26B	+27N	3.0	11.0	12.0	5.75	1696	+20.0
15	Paipo, Sebastian	1524	URU	−2B	−13N	+40B	+34N	+28B	3.0	10.5	10.5	3.50	1661	+38.4
16	Baptista, Emiliano	1689	URU	−30B	−10B	+39N	+32N	+18B	3.0	9.0	9.0	4.00	1511	-36.8
17	Acosta, Pablo	1488	URU	−28B	−34N	+38B	+29N	+36B	3.0	7.0	7.0	3.50	1589	+10.8
18	Villarreal, Julian	0	ARG	+13B	+28N	=1B	−7N	−16N	2.5	13.5	15.5	7.00	1693	0.0
19	Gutierrez, Ignacio	1616	URU	+35N	=4B	−7N	+20B	−21N	2.5	12.0	13.5	5.75	1457	-11.0
20	de los Santos, Joaquin	0	URU	+9N	=26B	−6N	−19N	+33B	2.5	11.5	13.0	6.00	1638	0.0
21	Caribe Santos, Luiz Carlos	1621	BRA	F	=12N	+33B	−1N	+19B	2.5	11.0	11.0	5.50	1763	+11.2
22	Roselli, Juan	1596	URU	−12B	+40N	+30B	−5N	=23N	2.5	11.0	11.0	3.25	1696	+20.8
23	Egorova, Daria	1668	RUS	−32B	+31N	+34B	−13N	=22B	2.5	9.0	10.5	4.75	1561	-29.2
24	Rodriguez Sosa, Gustavo	1724	URU	−33B	=11N	−29B	+30N	+35B	2.5	8.5	10.0	5.00	1502	-24.2
25	Perez Selios, Luis	1757	URU	+36B	+30N	−2B	−3N	F	2.0	11.5	11.5	3.50	1592	-17.4
26	Eisses, Lemuel	1656	URU	+39B	=20N	−12B	=14N	−10B	2.0	11.5	11.5	2.75	1535	-19.2
27	Fontora, Richard	1558	URU	−5B	+38N	+28B	−11N	−14B	2.0	11.5	11.5	2.00	1489	-13.6
28	Porteiro, Clara	1665	URU	+17N	−18B	−27N	+31B	−15N	2.0	10.5	12.5	5.00	1530	-28.4
29	Leon Lacuesta, Diego	1562	URU	−6N	−35B	+24N	−17B	+37N	2.0	10.5	11.5	3.50	1534	-2.6
30	Fabra, Nathaniel	1536	URU	+16N	−25B	−22N	−24B	+38N	2.0	10.0	10.0	3.00	1499	-8.0
31	Marquez, Uberlindo	1552	URU	−1B	−23B	+37N	−28N	+39B	2.0	9.5	9.5	1.00	1442	-11.4
32	Olivera, Ignacio	1505	URU	+23N	−2N	−3B	−16B	=34N	1.5	13.5	15.0	3.25	1491	-4.0
33	Tramutolo, Gustavo	1550	URU	+24N	=6B	−21N	−8B	−20N	1.5	12.0	14.5	4.25	1595	+4.0
34	Rodriguez Rearden, Jorge	1571	URU	−4N	+17B	−23N	−15B	=32B	1.5	12.0	13.5	3.75	1444	-17.4
35	Camirotti De Armas, Gustavo	0	URU	−19B	+29N	−13B	=36N	−24N	1.5	10.0	11.5	2.75	1460	0.0
36	Salaberry, Lucia	1558	URU	−25N	+37B	−9N	=35B	−17N	1.5	10.0	11.0	1.75	817	-51.2
37	Gibelli, Juan	0	URU	−14B	−36N	−31B	+40N	−29B	1.0	8.5	8.5	0.00	1303	0.0
38	Segovia, Pablo	0	URU	−3N	−27B	−17N	F	−30B	0.0	11.0	11.0	0.00	742	0.0
39	Manzur, Guadalupe	1458	URU	−26N	−9B	−16B	F	−31N	0.0	10.5	10.5	0.00	826	-45.2
40	Porteiro, Juana	1441	URU	−8N	−22B	−15N	−37B	F	0.0	10.0	10.0	0.00	779	-38.0

Key insights

Biggest movers and upsets — the story behind the numbers.

Top rating gainers

1Reyes, MatteoURU
+60.4
4.0 pts · #8
2Esquibel, JuanURU
+54.4
3.5 pts · #2
3Caminada, CamiloURU
+45.2
4.0 pts · #1

Top rating losers

1Salaberry, LuciaURU
-51.2
1.5 pts · #39
2Manzur, GuadalupeURU
-45.2
0.0 pts · #38
3Porteiro, JuanaURU
-38.0
0.0 pts · #37

Biggest upsets

R1+174 Elo gap
Tramutolo, Gustavo1550 beat Rodriguez Sosa, Gustavo1724
R4+173 Elo gap
Reyes, Matteo1584 beat Perez Selios, Luis1757
R1+163 Elo gap
Olivera, Ignacio1505 beat Egorova, Daria1668