CChessStats

Caissa Winter Standard U1800

Open SwissStandard

23 players participated in this 6-round tournament, held from 11 Jan 2026 to 01 Feb 2026 in Caissa Sheung Wan Centre, Hong Kong. 3 federations represented. Top 10 Elo average was 1526, and top seed was Marco Aurelio De Moura (🇧🇷 BRA, 1672).

Chi Ngo Chan (🇭🇰 HKG, 1511) won with 5.0/6, ahead of Hoi Cheung Wong (5.0) and Aravind Mahadevan (4.5). Chan shared the lead from round 2, winning on tie-break.

The biggest upset came in round 4: Hoi Cheung Wong (1492) beat Marco Aurelio De Moura (1672), a +180-point gap.

Location
🇭🇰Caissa Sheung Wan Centre, Hong Kong
Dates
11 Jan 2026 → 01 Feb 2026
Time control
Standard: 60 minutes for game
System
Swiss · 6 rounds
Top seed
🇧🇷Marco Aurelio De Moura1672
Avg top 10
1,526
Participants
23
Federations · 3 represented
🇭🇰Hong Kong China×16
FIDE (no federation)×2
🇧🇷Brazil×1
Top 3

How it unfolded

Top 6 · 6 rounds

Tight race until R6; 2 players tied at 5.0/6, decided on Buchholz.

Co-leaders
10
5
1
1
1
2
1.534.56R1R2R3R4R5R6
Wong5Chan5Mahadevan4.5Meng4Liu4Aravind3.5
R6 · TIEBREAK CLUSTER

2 players finish on 5.0/6. Chan takes the title on Buchholz Cut1 (18.5).

R6 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · WINNER VS 2ND

Hoi Cheung Wong beat Chi Ngo Chan (Black).

WIN STREAKS · 2 top finishers

Hoi Cheung Wong 4 wins (R3–R6)Chi Ngo Chan 5 wins (R1–R5)

Key matchups · top 4

Head-to-head between the four finishers
Player1234
1Hoi Cheung Wong*
1
0
—
2Chi Ngo Chan
0
*
1
1
3Aravind Mahadevan
1
0
*
½
4Xiangyi Meng—
0
½
*

Grille américaine

#PlayerEloFedR1R2R3R4R5R6PtsBu C1BuSBPerfΔ
1Chan, Chi Ngo1511HKG+23N+21B+3N+5B+4N−2B5.018.518.513.501706+40.4
2Wong, Hoi Cheung1492HKG+16N−3B+21N+15B+11B+1N5.016.517.513.001754+55.2
3Mahadevan, Aravind1542HKG+22B+2N−1B+6N+8B=4B4.520.521.014.001506-3.0
4Meng, Xiangyi1517HKG+10N+9B=5N+17B−1B=3N4.019.521.512.251580+18.0
5Liu, Shun Wang1501HKG+13B+17N=4B−1N=6B+8N4.018.020.011.251529+4.4
6Aravind, Tejas0HKG+12N+14B−15N−3B=5N+13B3.516.518.510.0014700.0
7Chan, Caius Chin-wan0HKG−21B+23N+13B−11N=12B+20N3.511.011.05.507190.0
8Huang, Yantao0HKG−14N+12B+9N+20B−3N−5B3.017.018.57.5013030.0
9Lau, Jonas Yee Shun1430HKG+18B−4N−8B+14B−10N+19N3.014.516.06.001514+9.2
10Chen, Zeming0FID−4B+18N−17B+21N+9B−11N3.014.015.06.0013130.0
11Wong, Yin Ki Patrick1520HKGFF+16N+7B−2N+10B3.013.513.58.50692-21.6
12Sun, Xiruo0HKG−6B−8N+22B+23N=7N=15B3.012.512.53.2516720.0
13Luk, Chun Yin0HKG−5N+19B−7N+16B=15N−6N2.515.016.54.5013930.0
14Huang, Man Ho Nathan1512HKG+8B−6N=20B−9N=18B=22N2.513.013.55.00629-24.4
15De Moura, Marco Aurelio1672BRAFF+6B−2N=13B=12N2.014.014.06.25692-29.6
16FIDE 60129220—−2B+22N−11B−13N+23B−18N2.013.013.00.507060.0
17Or, Lincoln1561HKG+19N−5B+10N−4NFF2.012.512.54.50708-45.6
18Sun, Kai Ming Spencer0HKG−9N−10BF=19B=14N+16B2.012.012.04.0012780.0
19Chen, Yanxi Lolly0FID−17B−13N+23B=18N−20N−9B1.511.011.01.006950.0
20Fung, Sze Chai Bryan0HKGFF=14N−8N+19B−7B1.510.510.52.7515120.0
21FIDE 60191880—+7N−1N−2B−10BFF1.017.017.03.507010.0
22FIDE 3430997990—−3N−16B−12NFF=14B0.513.013.01.2513340.0
23FIDE 60130900—−1B−7B−19N−12B−16NF0.015.015.00.007100.0

Key insights

Biggest movers and upsets — the story behind the numbers.

Top rating gainers
Top rating losers
Biggest upsets