1st Chess House Rating Tournament 2026 - Standard Superstar
17 players participated in this 9-round tournament, held from 09 Feb 2026 to 11 Feb 2026 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. 2 titled players. Top 10 Elo average was 1878, and top seed was Tran Vo Quoc Bao (🇻🇳 VIE, 2118).
Tran Vo Quoc Bao (🇻🇳 VIE, 2118) won with 7.0/9, ahead of Tran Gia Thu Pham (6.0) and Nguyen Thanh Thuy Tien (6.0). Bao shared the lead from round 4 and won solo starting round 5.
The biggest upset came in round 9: Vuong Tuan Khoa (1715) beat Manh Truong Nguyen (2076), a +361-point gap.
- 🥇
- 🥈
- 🥉
How it unfolded
Top 6 · 9 roundsTran Vo Quoc Bao led from R5; +1.0-point edge over the runner-up. Title race converged from 2 co-leaders at R4 to 1 by R5.
Tran Vo Quoc Bao takes the sole lead (4.5/5).
Tran Vo Quoc Bao drew with WCM Tran Gia Thu Pham (Black).
Tran Vo Quoc Bao 3 wins (R3–R5)WIM Nguyen Thanh Thuy Tien 3 wins (R1–R3)
Key matchups · top 4
Head-to-head between the four finishers| Player | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Tran Vo Quoc Bao | * | ½ | ½ | 1 |
| 2WCMTran Gia Thu Pham | ½ | * | 1 | ½ |
| 3WIMNguyen Thanh Thuy Tien | ½ | 0 | * | ½ |
| 4Luu Huong Cuong Thinh | 0 | ½ | ½ | * |
Grille américaine
| # | Player | Elo | Fed | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 | R9 | Pts | Bu C1 | Bu | SB | Perf | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tran Vo Quoc Bao | 2118 | VIE | +8B | =2N | +6B | +4N | +11B | =3N | =7B | +10N | =5B | 7.0 | 43.0 | 47.0 | 35.75 | 2071 | -5.0 |
| 2 | Pham, Tran Gia ThuWCM | 1897 | VIE | +17N | =1B | +7N | +3B | −6N | =4B | +5N | −8B | +9N | 6.0 | 44.0 | 45.0 | 28.25 | 1991 | +23.2 |
| 3 | Nguyen Thanh Thuy TienWIM | 1937 | VIE | +11B | +13N | +12B | −2N | =5B | =1B | =6N | +7N | =4B | 6.0 | 41.5 | 44.5 | 26.75 | 1956 | +6.6 |
| 4 | Luu Huong Cuong Thinh | 1803 | VIE | +10N | =7B | =5N | −1B | +15N | =2N | =9B | +6B | =3N | 5.5 | 44.0 | 46.0 | 25.50 | 1943 | +33.0 |
| 5 | Tran Pham Quang Minh | 1848 | VIE | +14B | −6N | =4B | +8N | =3N | +9B | −2B | +12N | =1N | 5.5 | 42.5 | 45.0 | 24.25 | 1883 | +22.8 |
| 6 | Bui Quang Huy | 1952 | VIE | +15N | +5B | −1N | +14B | +2B | −7N | =3B | −4N | +13N | 5.5 | 40.5 | 42.5 | 22.00 | 1908 | -12.0 |
| 7 | Nguyen, Manh Truong | 2076 | VIE | +9B | =4N | −2B | +12N | +14N | +6B | =1N | −3B | −8N | 5.0 | 42.5 | 45.0 | 21.75 | 1874 | -40.0 |
| 8 | Vuong Tuan Khoa | 1715 | VIE | −1N | +17B | −14N | −5B | F | +12N | +11B | +2N | +7B | 5.0 | 34.0 | 34.0 | 19.00 | 1887 | +66.0 |
| 9 | Chang Pham Hoang Hai | 1709 | VIE | −7N | +10B | +13B | −11N | +12B | −5N | =4N | +16B | −2B | 4.5 | 36.5 | 38.5 | 15.25 | 1720 | -1.2 |
| 10 | Dao Khanh Lam | 1570 | VIE | −4B | −9N | F | =15N | +13B | +11N | +14B | −1B | +16N | 4.5 | 30.5 | 30.5 | 12.50 | 1731 | +55.2 |
| 11 | Ngo Minh Khang | 1660 | VIE | −3N | +16B | +17N | +9B | −1N | −10B | −8N | F | +15B | 4.0 | 32.0 | 32.0 | 9.50 | 1753 | +33.2 |
| 12 | Le Hong An | 1519 | VIE | +16N | +15B | −3N | −7B | −9N | −8B | +17N | −5B | F | 3.0 | 31.0 | 31.0 | 5.00 | 1681 | +52.8 |
| 13 | Nguyen Dang Khanh Linh | 0 | VIE | F | −3B | −9N | −16B | −10N | +17N | +15B | +14N | −6B | 3.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 5.50 | 1636 | 0.0 |
| 14 | Truong Thuc Quyen | 1579 | VIE | −5N | F | +8B | −6N | −7B | +16B | −10N | −13B | =17N | 2.5 | 31.5 | 31.5 | 7.50 | 1674 | +24.0 |
| 15 | Nguyen Thien Tam | 1666 | VIE | −6B | −12N | +16N | =10B | −4B | F | −13N | =17B | −11N | 2.0 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 4.75 | 1539 | -49.6 |
| 16 | Nguyen Minh Nhien | 1726 | VIE | −12B | −11N | −15B | +13N | +17B | −14N | F | −9N | −10B | 2.0 | 24.5 | 24.5 | 4.00 | 1313 | -138.8 |
| 17 | Luong Anh Tue | 1645 | VIE | −2B | −8N | −11B | F | −16N | −13B | −12B | =15N | =14B | 1.0 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 2.25 | 1371 | -88.0 |
Key insights
Biggest movers and upsets — the story behind the numbers.
- 1Vuong Tuan KhoaVIE+66.05.0 pts · #6
- 2Dao Khanh LamVIE+55.24.5 pts · #10
- 3Le Hong AnVIE+52.83.0 pts · #12
- 1Nguyen Minh NhienVIE-138.82.0 pts · #16
- 2Luong Anh TueVIE-88.01.0 pts · #17
- 3Nguyen Thien TamVIE-49.62.0 pts · #15
- R9+361 Elo gap
- R1+207 Elo gap
- R8+182 Elo gap